Commentary

A PROFESSIONAL CRITIQUE OF MITT ROMNEY’S 2011 and 2010 TAX RETURNS

By Andrew Schwartz, CPA

Last month, Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney released his 2011 and 2010 tax returns to the public.  You can download a complete copy of these federal tax returns at:

Here is  what I observed upon reviewing his returns:

  • Mitt Romney reported gross income of just about $21 million for each of these two years.  A little more than 50% of this income was from long-term capital gains and qualified dividends, which are taxed at the maximum rate of 15% for the regular tax calculation.  
  • With respect to his self-employment income, Mitt Romney did not appear to be very concerned about minimizing his tax burden.  Take a look at the Schedule C each year, and while he did not claim any expenses against his Author/Speaking Fees income of $110,500 in 2011, he did claim his agent commission of $39,756 and advertising expenses of $9,000, for a total of $48,756, against his gross self-employment income of $528,871in 2010. Apparently, he decided not to claim any other expenses, including the home office or automobile mileage, that many self-employed individuals claim on their Schedule C each year. Mitt Romney also did not contribute to a retirement plan either year based on his net self-employment income, which would have reduced his taxable income.
  • If you look at line 45 of his tax return for both year, you’ll see that he paid a ton of Alternative Minimum Taxes each year.  Based on these returns, his AMT was $224,425 in 2011 and $232,989 in 2010.  While most taxpayers with income greater than $1 million pay no AMT, people with substantial long-term capital gains and qualified dividends end up paying this tax due to how this tax calculation works.

More tomorrow!

1 thought on “A PROFESSIONAL CRITIQUE OF MITT ROMNEY’S 2011 and 2010 TAX RETURNS”

Leave a Reply